His dream is to make me smile.

18/11/2006

let me ask you why cant we set our own papers? what makes you think singaporeans must rely on some angmoh across the globe to mark our papers? why take the trouble? what happens if our papers that sit on the exact same plane that crashed into the sea....RAH HATE CAMBRIDGE!

especially history! WTH! THEY ARE DAMN BIAS LAH! they everyday ask about germany! EVERY SINGLE DAMN YEAR...WTH! its unfair....ok 1st point.

next for history paper. they TOTALLY BROKE THE RULES! 2nd point...they set questions that were never ever taught....questions that were totally not based on themes.!.... WTH! almost everyone who studied and didnt study have no difference lah! it was a test of how you crack your brain? i mean ok...for those who sit for the paper and did cold war que dont say a single word...we were told that it would come out. yes. BUT. we were told you do not have to study every single damn bloody chapter. ok so most of us let go of coldwar. cause you might just write out of point, because the timeline aint that clear. fine so i studied like half the textbook. which is actually alot already. considering that you would only be tested on ONE BLOODY QUESTION! and none came out! WTH! ok here are the 3 questoins.

1. league of nations. plus TOV. - i did this question - FIRST TIME IN MY LIFE!
2. united nations. plus something else. cant remember.
3. why was berlin blockade set up? plus. cold war... cant remember exact que/

look at those questions. NONE of them are based on COUNTRY! NO theme! ok the theme was about peace settlements. BUT IT AINT IN THE TEXT BOOK! you are bloody hell setting questions that were not based on themes! WHAT THE BLOODY HELL! they clearly broke the rules~ damn bloody clear broke the rules. if not they set new rules without us knowing.

i remember in my two years of education in history. my teacher only spent 5 mins blabbering about the structuce of league of nations and UN. SO....now you are tested on something that your teacher spent 5 mins teaching...IN a NATIONAL EXAM! and COME on lah. dont blame the teachers. you cant accuse that its their fault for not spending more time on these issues. LIKE COME ON LAH. history has better things to offer than just UN and league of nations. they know
what they are doing lah. so it aint their fault! its THE cambridge FAULT!

ok now for SBQ~ they are totally pure retards! like look at the sources...there is no link at all! like in between the sources there is no link! i think i can even set a better paper than them lah. not that i am good, but its just that THEY SUCK! what more the question asked and the soucre has NO BLOODY LINK! we were forced to create links! i mean this was not what we were taught. we were taught to compare...test usefulness and reliabilty. and now they give us sources and questions that failed to test us on things we were taught. WTH! how infuriating. and honestly the picture SUCK TO THE CORE! ok lah. this one might just be my own fault. fine. BUT ah...the questions were YUCKS LAH. honestly no link. how can they slaughter us like that?

come to think of it. we are trained differently from how the cambridge test us. why are we allowing some angmoh to determine our furture? since they test us in ways that we were not taught? ok to a certain extent we were taught differently from what they require. and i think we are doing a fine job. so why let them set the papers, mark the papers? aiya, i hate cambridge lah. so many cracks and flaws. honestly, you dont have to study to sit for Os. once you know what is going on.

Scintillate, Sparkle, Shine